Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice arrest theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 02:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Voice arrest theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unverifiable, only 2 ghits, both wiki mirrors. Wikipedia is not a place to publish original research. MER-C 08:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, it is likely this material is covered under a better name elsewhere. AnteaterZot 08:35, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletions. —Pete.Hurd 08:40, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete totally unsourced, ugly internal links lead to nothing related to the topic, ... and ... it's pure codswallop. Pete.Hurd 08:45, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Embarassing that its been around so long. Highly implausible content with absolutely no refs... WjBscribe 08:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this rubbish. Alberon 09:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete total bullshit. Kolindigo 17:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No references, unverifiable, no assertion of notability, no ghits, appears to be OR. I agree, it's embarrassing it survived three months, more than enough time to find references. Nothing in the Dr. Drew article. Suggest a snowball delete: WP:OR, WP:CITE, WP:NOTE, WP:SNOW. — Becksguy 19:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.